What is culture? Is it what sociologists and psychologists claim? Is it what public school teachers push? Or, is it what Hollywood and those like them believe?
The definition of a culture has changed. The New World Dictionary, 1927, stated that a culture is an enlightenment or development resulting from education and refinement. The primary meaning of a "cultured person" in 1927 was one who was enlightened or refined.
Sociology, a science based upon certain predilections that may or may not be correct, has imported meanings into the cloud containing the standard definition of culture, to include what one in 1927 would categorize as a deviation, a vague and less tenuous attempt to categorize and systemize what culture actually is. Gone is the desire for improvement or refinement, replaced by characterization of a particular subgroup's behaviors, regardless of their moral or educational value, insisting the sum of those experiences and thoughts, from a vast populace with similar beliefs, somehow represents a culture.
In the later part of the last century, for example, one could base popular music, art, and fashion that could be labeled according to period as a culture. In a sense, the old standard could be applied, however, the lack of improvement or educational development exposes the truth- that cannot be a true culture.
We have replaced the desire for one's improvement and refinement with characteristics of a generalized theme of debased behavior and lifestyle.
Can anyone rationally argue, based on the standard definition of culture that degenerative music, art, and fashion represents a culture? Is it not the opposite that it reveals? A lack of intelligence, excellence, a lack of refinement, a lack of sophistication is simply a lack of culture. Where culture does not exist, there is a tendency for society to descend into dysfunctionality.
Disjointed music, based upon an excess of primitive percussion, does not reflect culture, it reflects a lack of it. A constant droning, a constant repetition, a constant disharmony is not refinement. A chaotic arrangement of poison-based art, adorning one's body, is the pinnacle of that lack of culture, that lack of refinement.
In light of the loss of true refinement, we should rebel against that which the masses drink, that toxicity that clouds the mind and sends the soul toward Hell. True refinement is unadorned beauty, wearing the same unadorned skin as God gave you, singing in harmony as the angels sing in harmony, adhering to a higher level of moral rigor...pushing aside the decrepit, embracing the excellent.
There was a time I remember, when one of the purveyors of the current morass of culture-less propaganda, was preaching the need for refinement in the sense of being excellent. A grain of wisdom, a grain of beauty and richness was proposed as the pinnacle for a better education. For refinement. Yet, those wanting to control the future masses, rather than see them enlightened, threw out the virtues and exchanged the push for a more cultured life with a virus from the pit of Hell. This Leftist agenda, which was born in a foreign land, promised an elitist future where the few could rule and reign over peasant-like zombies who were uneducated and lacked a desire for refinement or culture.
That evil has many sisters, including woke ideology, "democratic" socialism, and the like, always leading down a dark hallway to an end without culture, without hope, and without God.
In a truly great society, refined music, art, and literature speak volumes about the achievements of that land and era. It is time we return to the concept of culture as it was nearly 100 years ago and pursue and teach our young to pursue a world with refinement, not chaotic decay.